search | site map | contact


return to 2003 Illinois Youth Summit page
Constitutional Rights Foundation Chicago
2003 Illinois Youth Summit Survey

Survey Closed
View results here

Describe your Location:
Chicago Illinois United States
International (Non-U.S.) No Response

Describe your community:
Rural Suburban Urban No Response

Gender: Male Female No Response

Age:


I. TORTURING SUSPECTED TERRORISTS
The United States has signed the United Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, which defines torture as "any act by which severe pain or suffering is intentionally inflicted on a person." Since September 11, however, some people have suggested that torture of suspected terrorists might help authorities prevent a similar catastrophe.

1. Should the United States consider using torture on suspected terrorists to gain information about imminent attacks on the United States and/or U.S. citizens?
Yes No Don't know

2. Should the United States "render" - turn over - suspected terrorists to countries that use torture during interrogation?
Yes No Don't know

3. Should interrogation methods such as sleep deprivation, sensory deprivation, and being held in painful and awkward positions - methods which some human rights advocates argue may constitute torture - be used by the United States?

Yes No Don't know

4. Should the federal government create a non-lethal "torture warrant" for use with uncooperative suspects whom the government reasonably believes have information about an imminent terrorist attack?

Yes No Don't know


II. EXPANDING SEARCH AND SEIZURE POWERS OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
The Federal Bureau of Investigation [FBI] is the primary criminal investigative agency in the federal government. Following the attacks of September 11, the central mission of the FBI became the prevention of terrorist acts against the United States and its people. In May 2002 U.S. Attorney General Ashcroft introduced new guidelines for investigations that include a new provision for counter-terrorism activities. Under the old guidelines, the FBI could open an inquiry of criminal activity as long as there was an allegation or information of possible criminal activity [II B (1)]. "For the purpose of detecting and preventing terrorist attacks," the new guidelines allow FBI agents to: attend any public meeting or demonstration, monitor internet chat rooms, and enter religious institutions and attend religious observances without agents necessarily following a lead that is part of an investigation or preliminary inquiry.

1. In order to prevent terrorism, should FBI agents be able to:

monitor public meetings?
Yes No Don't know

monitor internet chat rooms?
Yes No Don't know

attend religious observances and institutions?
Yes No Don't know

2. Some people are concerned that the power to visit public places and events might lead to "the bad old days" when the FBI spied on people like Dr. Martin Luther King who were engaged in protected First Amendment activities such as speech, assembly, and worship. Other people believe that the new guidelines are necessary because of the difficulties in tracking terrorists, and they note that no information from these visits shall be retained by the FBI unless it relates to potential criminal or terrorist activity.

Do you think the new guidelines provide:
too much power to FBI agents?
appropriate power to FBI agents?
not enough power to FBI agents?

3. For the purpose of detecting or preventing terrorist activities, should the FBI continue to be permitted to visit any place and attend any event that is open to the public, without any indication of criminal activity?
Yes No Don't know


III. CREATING A FEDERAL DATABASE
In response to the attacks of September 11, the U.S. Department of Defense has begun development of the Total Information Awareness (TIA) project. Part of this project is based on the idea that terrorist planning activities or a likely terrorist attack could be uncovered by searching vast quantities of "transaction" data, such as web searches, financial records, purchases, school records, medical records and travel histories. TIA would provide a database of information about individuals in the United States only using data that is legally available and obtainable by the U.S. Government.
1. For a federal database such as TIA, would you want to include/keep out the following personal information:

Financial Records?         Include Keep Out
Internet/email use?        Include Keep Out
Library/Video Records?  Include Keep Out
Medical Records?           Include Keep Out
School Records?           Include Keep Out
Travel Histories?           Include Keep Out
2. Will the Total Information Awareness project be an effective security measure to reduce the threat of terrorism?
Yes No Don't know

3. Is the Total Information Awareness project an acceptable use of personal information about U.S. citizens and residents by the federal government?
Yes No Don't know

4. Should the U.S. Government develop the Total Information Awareness project?
Yes No Don't know



-->


return to 2003 Illinois Youth Summit page