search | site map | contact


return to 2006 Illinois Youth Summit page

Constitutional Rights Foundation Chicago
2006 Illinois Youth Summit Survey

View results here

Describe your Location:
Chicago (city) Suburban Chicago Other Illinois Other United States
International (Non-U.S.) No Response

Describe your community:
Rural Suburban Urban No Response

Gender: Male Female No Response

Age:


I. EQUITY IN PUBLIC EDUCATION FUNDING
In Brown v. Board of Education (1954), the U.S. Supreme Court said "it is doubtful that any child may reasonably be expected to succeed in life if he is denied the opportunity of an education. Such an opportunity, where the state has undertaken to provide it, is a right which must be made available to all on equal terms." However, the Court later held in San Antonio v. Rodriguez (1973) that education is not considered a "fundamental right" protected by the federal constitution. Instead, education is a responsibility of the state governments, who also have the primary responsibility for funding it.

1. Should the following amendment to the Constitution of the United States be adopted? "All persons eighteen years of age or younger shall enjoy the right to a public education of equal high quality. The Congress shall have the power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation."
Yes No Don't know

2. Should the Illinois General Assembly enact a law committing the State to fund public education before all other state programs?
Yes No Don't know


II. VOTING RIGHTS FOR EX-FELONS
In the United States, the right to vote may not be abridged or denied by a state or the federal government because of race, sex, or failure to pay a poll [or head] tax. However, states can deny the right to vote to individuals guilty of a crime. Nationally, over four million Americans are denied this right as a result of state laws that prohibit voting by ex-felons. In 11 states, a felony conviction can result in a lifetime voting ban. Even in states where voting is restored, the process is often so difficult that few ex-felons are able to take advantage of it. Under current law, the federal government may not infringe upon a state's authority to grant or deny voting rights to prison inmates and former felons.

3. Should Congress create a law to automatically restore voting rights to persons once they have completed a felony prison sentence?
Yes No Don't know

4. Should Illinois formally notify each convicted person of the restoration of their right to vote upon release from confinement and formally notify all state and local election officials of this right?
Yes No Don't know


III. HOLDING U.S. CITIZENS AS ENEMY COMBATANTS
Following the attacks of September 11, 2001 by al Qaeda, the United States captured hundreds of persons and designated them "enemy combatants." Under this policy, the President determines who is an enemy combatant and places them in military detention without charges or access to an attorney. Most enemy combatants were captured in Afghanistan and are not American citizens. However, U.S. citizen Jose Padilla was detained at O'Hare International Airport in 2002 and subsequently designated by the President as an enemy combatant. Padilla allegedly plotted to detonate a "dirty" nuclear bomb. Recently, Padilla's status was changed without explanation, and he now faces federal felony charges.

5. Should the President have the power to seize U.S. citizens in civilian settings whom he identifies as 'enemy combatants' and hold them in military detention without criminal charge or trial until they are brought before a neutral decisionmaker who will determine whether this designation is true?
Yes No I Don't know.




return to 2006 Illinois Youth Summit page